ND vs Navy

A rich lush green landscape, majestic castles, a breathtaking coastline, and unmatched hospitality are just a few characteristics that separate Ireland from the rest of the world. This would be the setting for the Emerald Isle Classic at Aviva Stadium in Dublin, Ireland in a stadium that is used to seeing rugby and soccer. This would only be the second time and the first since 96′ that these two teams with rich histories of their own would meet. Notre Dame leads the series at 72-12-1.

In a nation full of history one of the most historic college football rivals would kick off the Saturday football season. The Fighting Irish of Notre Dame would take on the Midshipmen of Navy in the 85th meeting. With a shaky off-season that left Notre Dame with three suspended players including quarterback Tommy Reece, running back Cieere Wood, and linebacker Justin Utupo. The question for Notre Dame would be can they silence their critics despite, the missing starters? The answer is yes, as Notre Dame would blow out Navy 50-10.

How did the team earn the victory? The Fighting Irish won for four reasons; turnovers, Navy committed four while Notre Dame only had one. The second reason, Theo Riddick and George Atkins III combined for 206 years on the ground. The third reason, defense the Fighting Irish shut down the triple option (the heart and soul of the Navy’s offensive attack) giving Navy no chance to establish a rhythm. Finally, the true freshmen and highly recruited Everett Golson only turned over the ball once with an int and managed the game making only one mistake. Simply Notre Dame rolled over the Midshipmen.

This win was a must win for Notre Dame as they have one of the toughest schedules this year against five top 20 teams including Michigan, Michigan State, Stanford, Oklahoma, and USC. The next opponent for the Fighting Irish is long time rival Purdue as the Irish opens their home season on NBC kickoff is scheduled for 3:30p.m. ET.

Understanding Uterine Polyps: Causes, Symptoms, and Effective Treatments

What Are Uterine Polyps?
Uterine polyps, also referred to as endometrial polyps, are growths attached to the inner wall of the uterus that extend into the uterine cavity. They range in size from a few millimeters to several centimeters. The prevalence of uterine polyps is not precisely known, but they are considered a common gynecological condition. According to a study published in the “American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,” uterine polyps were found in 24% of women who underwent hysteroscopy for various indications (source).

Causes of Uterine Polyps
The exact cause of uterine polyps is not fully understood, but they are believed to be associated with hormonal factors. They tend to grow when there is more of the hormone estrogen in the body. Some potential risk factors include:

Age, particularly during perimenopause or postmenopause
High blood pressure (hypertension)
Obesity
Tamoxifen, a drug used for breast cancer treatment
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)
Recognizing the Symptoms
Many women with uterine polyps may not experience any symptoms. However, when symptoms are present, they can include:

Irregular menstrual bleeding
Excessively heavy menstrual periods
Bleeding between menstrual periods
Vaginal bleeding after menopause
Infertility
It’s important to note that these symptoms can also be indicative of other conditions, such as fibroids or endometrial cancer. Therefore, medical evaluation is essential for an accurate diagnosis.

Diagnostic Approaches
To diagnose uterine polyps, healthcare providers may use the following methods:

Transvaginal ultrasound
Hysterosonography, which involves filling the uterus with saline during an ultrasound
Hysteroscopy, allowing the doctor to see inside the uterus
Endometrial biopsy
Treatment Options
Treatment for uterine polyps may vary depending on the size and number of polyps, symptoms, and whether a woman wishes to have children. Common treatments include:

Medication: Hormonal treatments can help shrink polyps, but they may recur after treatment ends.
Surgical Removal: Polypectomy, often performed during a hysteroscopy, is a common procedure to remove polyps.
Hysterectomy: In rare cases, especially if polyps are cancerous or precancerous, removal of the uterus may be recommended.
For those seeking specialized care, the Indira IVF Center is recognized for its expertise in treating uterine polyps. To learn more about their approach to managing this condition, you can visit their website here.

The Importance of Follow-Up
After treatment, follow-up care is crucial to monitor for potential recurrence. Regular check-ups with a healthcare provider can help ensure that any new polyps are detected and treated early.

Conclusion
Uterine polyps are a condition that requires attention due to their potential to mimic more serious diseases and their association with infertility. With proper diagnosis and treatment, most women can expect a good outcome. It’s essential for women to be aware of the symptoms and seek medical advice if they experience any irregularities in their menstrual cycle or postmenopausal bleeding.

Exploring the Frontier of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Understanding Immune Checkpoint Proteins
Immune checkpoints are regulatory pathways in the immune system that maintain self-tolerance and modulate the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses. They are crucial for preventing autoimmunity but can be co-opted by cancer cells to evade immune detection. Several immune checkpoint proteins have been identified, including:

IDO
TDO
PD-1
PD-L1
CTLA-4
KIR
4-1BB (CD137)
OX40 (CD134)
LAG3
B7-H3 (CD276)
TIM3
TIGIT
BTLA
VISTA
ICOS
CD39
CD27
CD30 (TNFRSF8)
CD28
B7-H4 (B7-S1, B7x, VCTN1)
HHLA2
Galectins
CD155
These proteins are found on T cells or cancer cells and play diverse roles in immune regulation. The focus of this article is on the major checkpoint inhibitors and their mechanisms of action (MOA), as well as the trends in current and future research.

Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody Therapy
The Role of CTLA-4 in Immune Regulation
CTLA-4, or CD152, is a protein expressed on activated T cells that competes with the costimulatory receptor CD28 for binding to ligands CD80 and CD86 on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). CTLA-4 acts as an “off” switch for T cells, dampening immune responses and promoting self-tolerance. It achieves this by outcompeting CD28 for ligand binding, recruiting phosphatases to its intracellular domain to diminish T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, and by removing CD80 and CD86 from APCs through transendocytosis.

Ipilimumab: A Pioneer in CTLA-4 Inhibition
The first and currently only approved CTLA-4 inhibitor is Ipilimumab (Yervoy), developed by Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and approved by the FDA in 2011 for melanoma treatment. Ipilimumab works by binding to CTLA-4, blocking its interaction with CD80/CD86, and thereby potentiating T cell activation and proliferation. Despite its success, another CTLA-4 inhibitor, Tremelimumab, has not been approved due to unsatisfactory clinical performance.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy
Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Axis
PD-1 is a protein on the surface of T cells that, upon binding to its ligands PD-L1 or PD-L2, inhibits TCR signaling and T cell activation. This pathway is often exploited by tumors to suppress the immune response. Inhibitors of PD-1 or PD-L1 can restore T cell activity and promote anti-tumor immunity.

Success Stories in PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition
The FDA has approved several PD-1 inhibitors, including Merck’s Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and BMS’s Nivolumab (Opdivo), which have shown impressive sales and a range of indications such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and more. Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) by Roche/Genentech is the sole marketed PD-L1 inhibitor, approved for bladder and non-small cell lung cancer treatment. Other PD-L1 inhibitors in clinical trials include BMS 936559, Durvalumab by AstraZeneca, and Avelumab in collaboration with Pfizer.

Anti-LAG-3 Therapy
LAG-3: A Complementary Immune Checkpoint
LAG-3, or CD223, is structurally similar to CD4 but binds with higher affinity to MHC class II molecules. It is expressed on activated T cells, B cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells, and negatively regulates T cell function. Inhibiting LAG-3 can enhance T cell responses, particularly when combined with PD-1 inhibitors.

Clinical Trials Targeting LAG-3
Several companies are investigating LAG-3 inhibitors, including BMS9861 by BMS, REGN3767 by Regeneron and Sanofi, and LAG525 by Novartis. These trials are exploring the potential of LAG-3 inhibitors as monotherapies or in combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The Future of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition
The field of immune checkpoint inhibition is rapidly evolving, with numerous clinical trials underway to explore the full potential of these therapies. The combination of different checkpoint inhibitors, as well as their use with other treatment modalities, offers promising avenues for enhancing anti-tumor immunity and improving patient outcomes.

For more detailed information on immune checkpoint inhibitors, readers can refer to authoritative sources such as the National Cancer Institute and FDA announcements on drug approvals.

Interesting statistics and trends in the development and sales of immune checkpoint inhibitors are often discussed in industry reports and scientific publications, providing insights into the growing impact of these therapies on cancer treatment.